Biography

Political theorist and political scientist who wrote (1999) are his most well-known works. He started working at the Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University in 1967, and he later joined New York University in 1970. More specifically, Postman is interested in the ways that high-tech society impacts civic virtue, political practices, and democratic values. Postman invites readers to Although this is a strange request, it is crucial to understanding Postman's argument because it indicates that his thesis does not directly follow from any of the main discussions surrounding technology and society.

He invites us to think about Huxley's interpretation of the gift of technology in relation to democracy. This criticism of postwar America is significant and practical; it is not an academic point. Technological utopians versus technological skeptics, technological determinists versus technological voluntarists, and techno-optimists versus techno-pessimists are just a few of the major arguments of Postman's era that his There is little evidence to suggest that Postman adheres to the technophobes who view technology as essentially anti-human or that he holds the Orwellian view that technology is intrinsically authoritarian.

According to Postman, our technology pushes us to act in ways that are at odds with democratic principles and responsible politics. We could consider Postman to be Alexis de Tocqueville's intellectual successor. Although Postman's writings are infused with a modern sensibility, his ideas are still influenced by classical philosophy. Technology has shaped that sensibility. This kind of persuasion is intended to be so strong that the affected individuals accept ideas, facts, or beliefs that they might otherwise reject.

Why is brainwashing so harmful? Brainwashing is a type of psychological manipulation that aims to convince an individual or a group of individuals to accept a belief as fact or to embrace a particular message as truth. That lesson is timeless. Even in his harshest criticisms, his warmth and humor are evident. Postman assists us in rediscovering the importance of context and quiet in a world full of content.

I become aware of how accurate his diagnosis was whenever I read this article news reports that seem more like theater than reporting or witness friends participate in arguments that resemble staged performances. What matters is the habits we form around it. However, I am thankful that someone provided us with the vocabulary to comprehend it rather than feeling hopeless. He understood that technology isn't destiny. There are multiple directions one could take. According to Postman, these two pictures provide conflicting explanations for why people submit to corrupt political systems.

We might think about how Postman predicted that information, spectacle, emotionalism, We might concentrate on his foresight regarding the emergence of social media and the decline of print and television news.